BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Brian Nord (Fermilab)
DTSTART:20210504T170000Z
DTEND:20210504T180000Z
DTSTAMP:20260423T024534Z
UID:nhetc/13
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/nhetc/13/">D
 eeply Uncertain: (how) can we make deep learning tools trustworthy for sci
 entific measurements?</a>\nby Brian Nord (Fermilab) as part of NHETC Semin
 ar\n\n\nAbstract\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) --- including machine learn
 ing and deep learning --- refers to a set of techniques that rely primaril
 y on the data itself for the construction of a quantitative model. AI has 
 been in development for about three quarters of a century\, but there has 
 been a recent resurgence in research and applications. This current (third
 ) wave of AI progress is marked by extraordinary results --- for example\,
  in image analysis\, language translation\, and machine automation. Despit
 e the modest definition of AI\, its potential to disrupt technologies\, ec
 onomies\, society\, and even science is often presented as unmatched in mo
 dern times. However\, along with the promise of AI\, there are significant
  challenges to overcome to reach a degree of reliability that is on par wi
 th more traditional modeling methods. \nIn particular\, uncertainty quanti
 fication metrics derived from deep neural networks are yet to be made phys
 ically interpretable. For example\, when one uses a convolutional neural n
 etwork to measure values from an image (e.g.\, regression for galaxy prope
 rties)\, the error estimates do not necessarily match those from an MCMC l
 ikelihood fit. In this presentation\, I will discuss the landscape of unce
 rtainty quantification in deep learning\, as well as some computational ex
 periments in a physical context that demonstrate a mismatch between errors
  derived directly from deep learning methods and those derived through tra
 ditional error propagation. Before we can apply deep learning tools confid
 ently for the direct measurement of physical properties\, we’ll need sta
 tistically robust error estimation methods.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/nhetc/13/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
