BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Ian Aberbach (University of Missouri\, Columbia\, MO)
DTSTART:20201204T130000Z
DTEND:20201204T143000Z
DTSTAMP:20260423T020952Z
UID:VCAS/45
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/VCAS/45/">On
  the equivalence of weak and strong F-regularity</a>\nby Ian Aberbach (Uni
 versity of Missouri\, Columbia\, MO) as part of IIT Bombay Virtual Commuta
 tive Algebra Seminar\n\n\nAbstract\nLet $(R\, \\mathfrak m\, k)$ be a (Noe
 therian) local ring of positive prime characteristic $p.$  Assume also\, f
 or simplicity\, that $R$ is complete (or\, more generally\, excellent).   
 In such rings we have the notion of tight closure of an ideal\, defined by
  Hochster and Huneke\, using the Frobenius endomorphism.  The tight closur
 e of an ideal sits between the ideal itself and its integral closure.  Whe
 n the tight closure of an ideal $I$ is $I$ itself we call $I$ tightly clos
 ed. For particularly nice rings\, e.g.\, regular rings\, every ideal is ti
 ghtly closed.  We call such rings weakly $F$-regular.  Unfortunately\, tig
 ht closure is known not to commute with localization\, and hence this prop
 erty of being weakly $F$-regular is not known to localize.  To deal with t
 his problem\, Hochster and Huneke defined the notion of strongly $F$-regul
 ar (assuming $R$ is $F$-finite)\, which does localize\, and implies that $
 R$ is weakly $F$-regular.  It is still an open question whether or not the
  two notions are equivalent\, although it has been shown in some classes o
 f rings.  Not much progress has been made in the last 15-20 years.  I will
  discuss the problem itself\, the cases that are known\, and also outline 
 recent progress made by myself and Thomas Polstra.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/VCAS/45/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
