BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Urs Schreiber
DTSTART:20230824T170000Z
DTEND:20230824T180000Z
DTSTAMP:20260403T200056Z
UID:ToposInstituteColloquium/104
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/ToposInstitu
 teColloquium/104/">Quantum Programming via Linear Homotopy Types</a>\nby U
 rs Schreiber as part of Topos Institute Colloquium\n\n\nAbstract\nThe intr
 icacies of realistic — namely: of classically controlled and\n(topologic
 ally) error-protected — quantum algorithms arguably make\ncomputer-assis
 ted verification a practical necessity\; and yet a\nsatisfactory theory of
  dependent quantum data types had been missing\,\ncertainly one that would
  be aware of topological error-protection.\n\nTo solve this problem we pre
 sent Linear homotopy type theory (LHoTT)\nas a programming and certificati
 on language for quantum computers with\nclassical control and topologicall
 y protected quantum gates\, focusing\non (1.) its categorical semantics\, 
 which is a homotopy-theoretic\nextension of that of Proto-Quipper and a pa
 rameterized extension of\nAbramsky et al.'s quantum protocols\, (2.) its e
 xpression of quantum\nmeasurement as a computational effect induced from d
 ependent linear\ntype formation and reminiscent of Lee at al.‘s dynamic 
 lifting monad\nbut recovering the interacting systems of Coecke et al.‘s
  "classical\nstructures" monads.\n\nNamely\, we have recently shown that c
 lassical dependent type theory in\nits novel but mature full-blown form of
  Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT) is\nnaturally a certification language for re
 alistic topological logic\ngates. But given that categorical semantics of 
 HoTT is famously\nprovided by parameterized homotopy theory\, we had argue
 d earlier\n[Sc14] for a quantum enhancement LHoTT of classical HoTT\, now 
 with\nsemantics in parameterized stable homotopy theory. This linear\nhomo
 topy type theory LHoTT has meanwhile been formally described\; here\nwe ex
 plain it as the previously missing certified quantum language\nwith monadi
 c dynamic lifting\, as announced in.\n\nConcretely\, we observe that besid
 es its support\, inherited from HoTT\,\nfor topological logic gates\, LHoT
 T intrinsically provides a system of\nmonadic computational effects which 
 realize what in algebraic topology\nis known as the ambidextrous form of G
 rothendieck’s “Motivic Yoga”\;\nand we show how this naturally serve
 s to code quantum circuits subject\nto classical control implemented via c
 omputational effects. Logically\nthis emerges as a linearly-typed quantum 
 version of epistemic modal\nlogic inside LHoTT\, which besides providing a
  philosophically\nsatisfactory formulation of quantum measurement\, makes 
 the language\nvalidate the quantum programming language axioms proposed by
  Staton\;\nnotably the deferred measurement principle is verified by LHoTT
 .\n\nFinally we indicate the syntax of a domain-specific programming\nlang
 uage QS (an abbreviation both for “Quantum Systems” and for “QS^0\n-
 modules” aka spectra) which sugars LHoTT to a practical quantum\nprogram
 ming language with all these features\; and we showcase\nQS-pseudocode for
  simple forms of key algorithm classes\, such as\nquantum teleportation\, 
 quantum error-correction and\nrepeat-until-success quantum gates.\n\n(This
  is joint work with D. J. Myers\, M. Riley and H. Sati.\nSlides will be av
 ailable at:\nncatlab.org/schreiber/show/Quantum+Certification+via+Linear+H
 omotopy+Types)\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/ToposInstituteColloquium/104/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
