BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Peter Zhang (UBC-O hosted) (Carnegie Mellon University)
DTSTART:20251118T233000Z
DTEND:20251119T003000Z
DTSTAMP:20260513T193649Z
UID:SFUOR/60
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/SFUOR/60/">R
 obust Paths: Geometry and Computation</a>\nby Peter Zhang (UBC-O hosted) (
 Carnegie Mellon University) as part of PIMS-CORDS SFU Operations Research 
 Seminar\n\nLecture held in ASB 10908.\n\nAbstract\nApplying robust optimiz
 ation often requires selecting an appropriate uncertainty set both in shap
 e and size\, a choice that directly affects the trade-off between average-
 case and worst-case performances. In practice\, this calibration is usuall
 y done via trial-and-error: solving the robust optimization problem many t
 imes with different uncertainty set shapes and sizes\, and examining their
  performance trade-off. This process is computationally expensive and ad h
 oc. In this work\, we take a principled approach to study this issue for r
 obust optimization problems with linear objective functions\, convex feasi
 ble regions\, and convex uncertainty sets. We introduce and study what we 
 define as the robust path: a set of robust solutions obtained by varying t
 he uncertainty set's parameters. Our central geometric insight is that a r
 obust path can be characterized as a Bregman projection of a curve (whose 
 geometry is defined by the uncertainty set) onto the feasible region. This
  leads to a surprising discovery that the robust path can be approximated 
 via the trajectories of standard optimization algorithms\, such as the pro
 ximal point method\, of the deterministic counterpart problem. We give a s
 harp approximation error bound and show it depends on the geometry of the 
 feasible region and the uncertainty set. We also illustrate two special ca
 ses where the approximation error is zero: the feasible region is polyhedr
 ally monotone (e.g.\, a simplex feasible region under an ellipsoidal uncer
 tainty set)\, or the feasible region and the uncertainty set follow a dual
  relationship. We demonstrate the practical impact of this approach in two
  settings: portfolio optimization and adversarial deep learning.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/SFUOR/60/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
