BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Nico Dirkes (RWTH Aachen)
DTSTART:20260622T110000Z
DTEND:20260622T123000Z
DTSTAMP:20260705T165130Z
UID:NSCM/217
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/NSCM/217/">C
 omputational Prediction of Red Blood Cell Damage: Mathematical Modeling an
 d Uncertainty Quantification</a>\nby Nico Dirkes (RWTH Aachen) as part of 
 Nečas Seminar on Continuum Mechanics\n\nLecture held in Room K6\,  Facult
 y of Mathematics and Physics\, Charles University\, Sokolovská 83  Prague
  8..\n\nAbstract\nComputational simulations have become an important tool 
 for the design of mechanical circulatory support devices as well as surgic
 al planning ahead of implantation. While computational fluid dynamics can 
 accurately predict flow fields\, the prediction of hemolysis (red blood ce
 ll damage) remains challenging. Absolute predictions of hemolysis indices 
 often deviate by multiple orders of magnitude from experimental measuremen
 ts. This discrepancy can be attributed to two issues. First\, most existin
 g models for hemolysis employ a simple power law relationship between shea
 r stress\, exposure time\, and hemolysis index\, with model parameters fit
 ted to experimental data. Second\, experimental data often exhibits large 
 variability between donors and between studies\, leading to significant un
 certainty in the fitted model parameters. This is due to individual differ
 ences in red blood cell properties and high sensitivity to experimental co
 nditions. Consequently\, the predictive capabilities of these models are l
 imited\, especially when applied to flow conditions that differ from those
  used in experiments.\n\nWe propose a two-sided approach to enhance the pr
 edictive capabilities of hemolysis models. First\, we introduce a more phy
 siological model that incorporates two important effects of the red blood 
 cell membrane: viscoelastic deformation and pore formation. We highlight t
 he differences between the Lagrangian and Eulerian model formulations. The
  Eulerian formulation enables a stabilized finite element discretization\,
  which we apply to various benchmark cases. Second\, we show how uncertain
 ty quantification techniques can be employed to account for the variabilit
 y in experimental data when fitting model parameters. This facilitates the
  integration of new experimental data as it becomes available\, thereby en
 abling patient-specific predictions of hemolysis. Overall\, this two-sided
  approach allows for more accurate and uncertainty-aware predictions of he
 molysis to support the development process of future generations of biomed
 ical devices.\n\nNote that we meet in the lecture  hall  K6.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/NSCM/217/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
