BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Peter Cameron (University of St Andrews)
DTSTART:20200522T080000Z
DTEND:20200522T090000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T225725Z
UID:GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/1
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCom
 binatoricsSeminar/1/">The geometry of diagonal groups</a>\nby Peter Camero
 n (University of St Andrews) as part of Groups and Combinatorics Seminar\n
 \nAbstract: TBA\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/1
 /
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Eric Swartz (College of William and Mary)
DTSTART:20200604T120000Z
DTEND:20200604T130000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T225725Z
UID:GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/2
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCom
 binatoricsSeminar/2/">Fuchs' problem for 2-groups</a>\nby Eric Swartz (Col
 lege of William and Mary) as part of Groups and Combinatorics Seminar\n\n\
 nAbstract\nWe say that a group G is realizable if there exists a ring R su
 ch that\nthe group of units of R is isomorphic to G.  Sixty years ago\, L
 ászló\nFuchs posed the problem of determining which groups are realizabl
 e as\nthe group of units of a commutative ring\, and the question of\ndete
 rmining whether a group or family of groups is realizable in any\nring has
  come to be called Fuchs' problem.  In recent years\, Fuchs'\nproblem has 
 been studied for various families of groups\, such as\ndihedral groups and
  simple groups\, although the problem of determining\nprecisely which grou
 ps are realizable is still very open in general\n(and is even still open i
 n the case when the ring is commutative\, as\nin Fuchs' original question)
 .  In this talk\, we will consider the\nquestion of which 2-groups are rea
 lizable as unit groups of finite\nrings\, a necessary step toward determin
 ing which nilpotent groups are\nrealizable.  This is joint work with Nicho
 las Werner.\n\nZoom link available 8 hrs before talk. See Eric's recent Jo
 urnal of Algebra paper (with the same title). This seminar is at an unusua
 l time because Eric will be speaking from Virginia\, USA.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/2
 /
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Dr G. Luke Morgan (FAMNIT\, University of Primorska)
DTSTART:20200626T080000Z
DTEND:20200626T090000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T225725Z
UID:GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/3
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCom
 binatoricsSeminar/3/">Some small progress on the PSV Conjecture</a>\nby Dr
  G. Luke Morgan (FAMNIT\, University of Primorska) as part of Groups and C
 ombinatorics Seminar\n\n\nAbstract\nThe subject of the talk is the questio
 n of bounding the number of automorphisms of arc-transitive graphs in term
 s of the valency of the graph. More specifically\, we consider the questio
 n for groups acting arc-transitively on graphs such that the local action 
 (that induced on the neighbours of a vertex by the stabiliser of that vert
 ex) is semiprimitive. This question was originated by Weiss for the case o
 f primitive local action and generalised by Praeger for the case of quasip
 rimitive local action. I will report on some recent small progress on the 
 first type - that of semiprimitive local action. The result is akin to Tut
 te’s famous result on cubic s-arc transitive graphs where the number of 
 automorphisms is bounded by 3*2^(s-1). Tutte's proof was elegant\, element
 ary and self-contained. The recent progress relies on some group theoretic
 al tools that were developed for use in the Classification of the Finite S
 imple Groups - and some tricks to allow us to patch things together. I'll 
 try to present these results in a friendly fashion\, as well as keeping in
  mind the ``big picture'' concerning where progress now stands on these co
 njectures.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/3
 /
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Gareth Tracey (Renyi Institute\, Budapest)
DTSTART:20200703T080000Z
DTEND:20200703T090000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T225725Z
UID:GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/4
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCom
 binatoricsSeminar/4/">On the Chebotarev invariant of a finite group</a>\nb
 y Gareth Tracey (Renyi Institute\, Budapest) as part of Groups and Combina
 torics Seminar\n\n\nAbstract\nGiven a finite group X\, a classical approac
 h to proving that X is the Galois group of a Galois extension K/Q can be d
 escribed roughly as follows: (1) prove that Gal(K/Q) is contained in X by 
 using known properties of the extension (for example\, the Galois group of
  an irreducible polynomial f (x) ∈ Z[x] of degree n embeds into the symm
 etric group Sym(n))\; (2) try to prove that X = Gal(K/Q) by computing the 
 Frobenius automorphisms modulo successive primes\, which gives conjugacy c
 lasses in Gal(K/Q)\, and hence in X. If these conjugacy classes can only o
 ccur in the case Gal(K/Q) = X\, then we are done. The Chebotarev invariant
  of X can roughly be described as the efficiency of this “algorithm”. 
 In this talk we will define the Chebotarev invariant precisely\, and descr
 ibe some new results concerning its asymptotic behaviour.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/4
 /
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Saul Freedman (University of St Andrews)
DTSTART:20200731T080000Z
DTEND:20200731T090000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T225725Z
UID:GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/5
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCom
 binatoricsSeminar/5/">The non-commuting\, non-generating graph of a group<
 /a>\nby Saul Freedman (University of St Andrews) as part of Groups and Com
 binatorics Seminar\n\n\nAbstract\nGiven a group G\, we can construct assoc
 iated graphs that encode certain relations between the elements (or subgro
 ups) of G. A well-known example is the generating graph of G\, whose verti
 ces are the nontrivial elements of G\, with two vertices joined if the ele
 ments form a generating set for G. In June this year\, Burness\, Guralnick
  and Harper showed that if the generating graph of a finite group has no i
 solated vertices\, then it as "dense" as possible\, in the sense that it i
 s connected with diameter at most 2. This generalises a famous result of B
 reuer\, Guralnick and Kantor from 2008: the generating graph of a non-abel
 ian finite simple group is connected with diameter 2.\n\nConsider now the 
 non-commuting\, non-generating graph of G\, obtained by taking the complem
 ent of the generating graph\, removing edges between elements that commute
 \, and finally removing vertices corresponding to elements of Z(G). In thi
 s talk\, we explore the connectedness and diameter of this graph for finit
 e (and certain infinite) groups G\, for example by studying the maximal su
 bgroup structure of G. In particular\, we prove a result that is perhaps s
 urprising: in many cases\, this naturally-defined subgraph of the compleme
 nt of the dense generating graph is itself similarly dense.\n\nWe also pre
 sent in this talk a new upper bound on the diameter of a related graph: th
 e intersection graph of a finite non-abelian simple group. The vertices of
  this graph are the nontrivial proper subgroups of the group\, with two su
 bgroups joined if they intersect nontrivially.\n\nPassword hint: 047877+ t
 he order of Alt(5)\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/GroupsAndCombinatoricsSeminar/5
 /
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
