BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:researchseminars.org
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:researchseminars.org
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Ken Ribet (UC Berkeley)
DTSTART:20210105T000000Z
DTEND:20210105T005000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/1
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/1/">Lan
 glands correspondence and geometry</a>\nby Ken Ribet (UC Berkeley) as part
  of CHAT (Career\, History And Thoughts) series\n\n\nAbstract\nThe Langlan
 ds program suggests innumerable problems in\narithmetic geometry.  One cla
 ss of problems concerns geometric and\ncohomological relations between alg
 ebraic varieties in case such\nrelations are predicted by a Langlands corr
 espondence between spaces\nof automorphic forms for different algebraic gr
 oups.  I will describe\nhow my quest for such a relation led me to realize
  that there can be a\nlink between the behavior of one Shimura variety in 
 one characteristic\nand the behavior of a second Shimura variety in a seco
 nd\ncharacteristic.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/1/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Benedict Gross (UCSD)
DTSTART:20210112T000000Z
DTEND:20210112T005000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/2
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/2/">The
  conjectures of Gan\, Gross\, and Prasad</a>\nby Benedict Gross (UCSD) as 
 part of CHAT (Career\, History And Thoughts) series\n\n\nAbstract\nI will 
 review the conjectures I made with Wee Teck Gan and Dipendra Prasad\, whic
 h provide a bridge between number theory and representation theory. Beside
 s stating the various conjectures and reviewing the main results that have
  been obtained in this direction\, I'll make some historical remarks on ho
 w we came to formulate them.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/2/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Michael Harris (Columbia)
DTSTART:20210202T000000Z
DTEND:20210202T005000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/3
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/3/">Gal
 ois representations and torsion cohomology: a series of misunderstandings<
 /a>\nby Michael Harris (Columbia) as part of CHAT (Career\, History And Th
 oughts) series\n\n\nAbstract\nIn 2013\, Peter Scholze announced his proof 
 that Galois representations with finite coefficients could be associated t
 o \ntorsion classes in the cohomology of certain locally symmetric spaces.
   The existence of such a\ncorrespondence had been predicted by a number o
 f mathematicians but for a long time no one had the slightest idea\nhow to
  construct the Galois representations.  In this talk I will review some of
  the history of the problem\, with\nemphasis on the many false starts and 
 occasional successes\, and on my own intermittent involvement\nwith this a
 nd related problems.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/3/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Barry Mazur (Harvard)
DTSTART:20210405T230000Z
DTEND:20210405T235000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/4
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/4/">Tho
 ughts about Primes and Knots</a>\nby Barry Mazur (Harvard) as part of CHAT
  (Career\, History And Thoughts) series\n\n\nAbstract\nKnots and their exq
 uisitely idiosyncratic properties\, are the vital essence of three-dimensi
 onal\ntopology. Primes and their exquisitely idiosyncratic properties\, ar
 e the vital essence of number\ntheory. A striking (and extremely useful) a
 nalogy between Knots and Primes helped me as I\nbecame as passionate about
  number theory as I was (and still am) about knots. I’m delighted\nto ha
 ve been asked by Shekhar and Chi-Yun to be part of the ‘experiment’ in
  this (experimental)\nseries of talks: CHAT: Career\, History and Thoughts
  to think again about this\, and take part\nin a Q&A with people in the se
 minar.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/4/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Peter Sarnak (Princeton)
DTSTART:20210517T230000Z
DTEND:20210517T235000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/5
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/5/">Aut
 omorphic Cuspidal Representations and Maass Forms</a>\nby Peter Sarnak (Pr
 inceton) as part of CHAT (Career\, History And Thoughts) series\n\n\nAbstr
 act\nThe building blocks for automorphic representations on $\\mathrm{GL}_
 n$ are the cusp forms. Even the existence of Maass cusp forms is subtle an
 d tied to arithmetic. I will describe some of my many encounters with thes
 e trascendental objects and speculate about their role in number theory.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/5/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Henri Darmon (McGill)
DTSTART:20210524T230000Z
DTEND:20210524T235000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/6
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/6/">Mod
 ular functions and explicit class field theory: private reminiscences and 
 public confessions</a>\nby Henri Darmon (McGill) as part of CHAT (Career\,
  History And Thoughts) series\n\n\nAbstract\nThe problem of constructing c
 lass fields of number fields from explicit  values of modular functions ha
 s its roots in the theory of cyclotomic fields and the theory of complex m
 ultiplication. The latter theory acquired a renewed currency in the second
  half of the 20th century through its connections to the arithmetic of ell
 iptic curves\, manifested in the work of Coates--Wiles\, Rubin\, Gross--Za
 gier\, and Kolyvagin. \n\nI will  give a personal account of my path towar
 ds a (slightly) better understanding of explicit class field theory for re
 al quadratic fields and its applications to elliptic curves\, taking advan
 tage of the CHAT format to focus on the misconceptions\, false starts\, an
 d dead ends that have marked my roundabout and tortuous\, but also very en
 joyable\, mathematical journey so far.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/6/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Hélène Esnault (FU Berlin/Harvard/Copenhagen)
DTSTART:20231204T230000Z
DTEND:20231204T235000Z
DTSTAMP:20260422T212606Z
UID:CHAT/7
DESCRIPTION:Title: <a href="https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/7/">Cod
 imension one in Algebraic and Arithmetic Geometry</a>\nby Hélène Esnault
  (FU Berlin/Harvard/Copenhagen) as part of CHAT (Career\, History And Thou
 ghts) series\n\n\nAbstract\nThe notions of $\\textit{weight}$ in complex g
 eometry and in $\\ell$-adic theory in geometry over a finite field\nhave b
 een developed by Deligne and by the Grothendieck  school. The analogy betw
 een the theories is  foundational \nand led to  predictions and theorems o
 n both sides. \nOn the complex Hodge theory side\, not only do we have the
  weight filtration\, but we  also have the Hodge filtration. \nThe analogy
  on the $\\ell$-adic side over a finite field hasn’t really been documen
 ted by Deligne. \nThinking of this gave the way to understand the Lang--Ma
 nin conjecture according to which smooth projective\n rationally connected
  varieties over a finite field possess a rational point. \n$\\url{http://p
 age.mi.fu-berlin.de/esnault/preprints/helene/62-chowgroup.pdf}$\n\nOn the 
 other hand\, we know the formulation in complex geometry of the Hodge conj
 ecture: on a smooth projective complex variety $X$\, \na sub-Hodge structu
 re of $H^{2j}(X)$  of Hodge type   $(j\,j)$ should be supported on a  codi
 mension $j$ cycle. The analog  $\\ell$-adic conjecture \nhas been formulat
 ed by Tate\, even over a number field. Grothendieck’s generalized Hodge 
 conjecture is straightforwardly formulated: \na sub-Hodge structure $H$ of
  $H^i(X)$ of Hodge type $(i-1\,1)\, (i-2\,2)\, \\ldots\, (1\,i-1)$ should 
 be supported on a codimension $1$ cycle. \nEquivalently it should die at t
 he generic point of the variety. \nThis is difficult to formulate because 
 Hodge structures are complicated to describe. But there is one instance fo
 r which we can bypass the Hodge formulation:\n$H=H^i(X)$ and $H^{0\,i}=H^i
 (X\, \\mathcal O)(=H^{i\,0}=H^0(X\, \\Omega^i))=0$. Then the conjecture de
 scends to the field of definition of $X$ and becomes purely algebraic. \nI
 t is on the one hand related to the (quite bold) motivic conjectures predi
 cting that $H^i(X\,\\mathcal O)=0$ for all $i\\neq 0$ should be equivalent
  to the triviality of the Chow group of $0$-cycles over a large field (thi
 s brings us back to the proof of the Lang--Manin conjecture). On the other
  hand\, as it is purely algebraic\, one can try to think of it in the fram
 ework of today’s $p$-adic Hodge theory.\n
LOCATION:https://researchseminars.org/talk/CHAT/7/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
